gwendolyngrey: (Default)
Gwendolyn ([personal profile] gwendolyngrey) wrote2009-06-23 03:54 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

I just spent the last two and a half hours uploading my pictures from the weekend (which included a trip to Ft. Meigs for a timeline event and Mike's 21st birthday) and now I only have about five minutes before I have to get ready for work.

I suppose I'll just wait and post about it all once I'm home tonight.

Until then, here's a scan of something slightly older but still very cool. Tyler and I had a tintype taken at Greenfield village three or four weeks ago and I only just got it this past weekend.  I don't like the shape of my hoop, but I love the picture anyway...

[identity profile] bite-the-rose.livejournal.com 2009-06-24 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
if it were a bit grainier/rougher, i wouldn't be able to tell this from one taken at the turn of the century.

[identity profile] idlewild-grey.livejournal.com 2009-06-24 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, it doesn't have the benefit of being knocked around for over a hundred years! Although tintypes as a form of photography are actually really clear... even the ones from the 1860s are often really crisp (assuming the photographer focused the image well) and show some incredible detail.